'King Lear Essay\r'

'Similar to objective life, characters in books and make ups have significant flaws. The way those flaws chance a part in the character’s life is what establishs them apart. The misguided actions and flaws of a character last lead to their demise. Shakespeare’s disaster queer Lear is a detailed exposition of the consequences of one man’s poor decisions. The man is Lear, King of England, whose decision to distri notwithstandinge his mightdom found on which of his children some delight in him greatly alter his life and the lives of those around him. Shakespeare shows us how one flaw in an otherwise design person can lead to their ultimate demise.\r\n gibe to critic Northrop Frye, â€Å" sad acees are so practically the highest points in their pitying landscape that they gibem the essential conductors of the power ab reveal them, great trees more in all likelihood to be struck by lightning that a pluck of grass. Conductors may of course be inst ruments as intumesce as victims of the divisive lightning. ” Based on Frye’s criticism ab stunned tragical milling machineryes, the character King Lear is the perfect example. In Frye’s words â€Å"Tragic heroes are so much the highest points in their human landscape,” refers to the tragic hero being the one that stands out amongst the other characters.\r\nThe tragic hero doesn’t see the problem he creates or is given to him which makes him the tragic hero. In Shakespeare’s King Lear, Lear is the tragic hero be hit he doesn’t see the problems he created by dividing the body politic amongst his daughters. Lear is a high point in the human landscape undecomposed because he is the king in the very beginning making him faraway more important than the other characters. From the very offset act the readers can see blindness he has towards bask and loyalty. He chooses to divide the kingdom based on love and when he is oblivious to th e unfeigned love of Cordelia and Kent he banishes them.\r\nThroughout the play, and from act one, Lear is encircled by, a compliment of great deal that love him dearly, people who would gladly sacrifice their lives for him. He turns on most, if non every single one of these people, and when he actually starts to lose sanity, things only go from bad to worse. wherefore Lear’s status and tragic flaw set him apart from the rest of the characters making him the tragic hero that Frye describes. As stated by Frye â€Å"they seem the undeniable conductors of the power slightly them,” is criticizing the inevitability of events.\r\nThe characters unknowingly institutionalize themselves in a situation where they have nowhere to go but down. Lear exemplifies this exact quality of by chance put himself in danger, when he wished to divide the kingdom based on love. Lear did non think in front deciding to split the kingdom into ternary pit parts. Since he didn’t d o he brought battle between the daughters. Also the fact that who he sight love him the most turned out to be two daughters that just had greed for power and fortune, adds to the argument. Lear started out with good intentions, but when he chooses love as a way to divide the kingdom.\r\nHe was unavoidable set up to trouble. Lear was a foolish old man, who thought the idea of dividing his kingdom up among his three daughters according to who said she loved him most would flatter his ego. However he did not know how events would play out in the end. Lear’s inevitability of failure is what causes him to be the perfect example of a tragic hero. Finally Frye comments on the way characters inadvertently cause the low of others and himself. His comments are â€Å"great trees [are] more seeming to be struck by lightning than a chunk of grass.\r\nConductors may of course by instruments as wholesome as victims of the divisive lightning. ” The mistakes of Lear are not ju st the suffering of one man but the suffering of everyone down the chain. Lear’s decisions have caused Kent and Cordelia to say things Lear does not want to hear, getting them banished. Another person to be hurt by Lear is Gloucester, who loses his status and eyes. Lear is the instrument in that he causes other people suffering. However he is also a victim to his actions and the great tragedy that is the lightning.\r\nAll of the pain that Lear suffered is traced back to the single most important error that he made; the prime(a) to give up his throne. This one mistake has proven to have massive effects upon Lear and the lives of those around him eventually killing almost all of those who were involved. Since Lear is the cause of so much suffering, he fits Frys’e description of a tragic hero well. Lear’s extremely despotic pride supplies him the strength and confidence to rule kingdom, but at the same time blinds him from recognizing true love and loyalty. That is the tragic â€Å"flaw” which eventually costs him both his ingdom and his beloved daughter, the only one of the three who loved him as a father, and the only daughter who cared about a jealous, foolish, and impulsive old man.\r\nAccording to Frye’s description of a tragic hero Lear fits the description perfectly. The tragic demeanor of the play and the tragic hero adds to the travesty at the end. Everyone ends up dying without salvation or redemption. The bitterness, sadness, and reality of the human psyche that is contained passim this work demonstrate its tragic nature best, however. Shakespeare puts a mess across about thinking before you act because the people around you will be affected.\r\n'