Comparison Between Two Poems By Two Different Poets About London †Wordsworth and Blake Essay

William Blake and William Wordsworths metrical compositions have influenced pack from all over the world by the feelings that all(prenominal) of their rimes have expressed, the ability which the poesys have of trance the readers charge and the variety of struggles each of the poets have with each a nonher(prenominal) as well as the different perspectives each poet sees the world.William Blake as well as being an English poet, was renowned for his artwork and for his engraving. With these more or less random abilities and talents, Blake cold creates a unique from of illustrated meter. Born on the twenty-eighth November 1757, as the son of a hosier, Blake grew up as a capital of the United Kingdomer and lived in London for the majority of his life where most of his inspiration as an workman in both poetry and painting originated. Beginning his life as a poet at an early age of twelve it is seen that Blake was able to advance and show his views of London and its populatio n as both a squirt and as an adult. Much of his work symbolises religion as umteen forms of animals and other forms of species. His contradictory view on life with songs like the Lamb, and its other fractional the Tyger, show life and feelings from different perspectives.William Wordsworth was also an English poet who was the most authoritative of English romantic poets. Born later than Blake on 7th April 1770, he lived in a family of high status unlike Blake. He went to school quantify at Saint Johns College where he was inspired by its tails of scenic beauty in his poems. His love for his family also provoked him to deliver poems also, for caseful the poem To My Sister. Wordsworth never mystifyingened his meanings of his poems as a great deal as Blake scarcely nevertheless did they show lack of depth.The first poem London by William Blake tells us only that the poem is about London. It is obviously difficult to desexualize any predictions regarding what the components of the poem are, alone it enables the reader to assume that it is a result Blake considers really seriously. The first lineI wander thro each leadd streetmore or less points out that the poem is in fact one of Blakes experiences, as if he himself is apprisal a story in a lyrical sense. The haggling I wander stand out very much compared to the remaining leave of the line. It gives the impression that the poem is a individualal feeling of by chance angst or depression of the poet about living in a city such(prenominal) as London consisting of a fairly large population that at times it becomes overcrowded and people are unable to withstand themselves from feeling the alike depression as their neighbours would feel. Or perhaps, beca delectation of living in the city for so long Blake had witnessed the sadness of his fellow Londoners as the wordsAnd mark in every face I seeMarks of failing, marks of excruciationindicate. The technique of which is considerable effective and a tactful approach apply by Blake so the reader does not suffer from boredom by usage of the invariable words. The pun of the repetitive word mark or marks, means in the first line it is utilise, that Blake had noticed the emotions revealed by the Londoners faces and taken into describe from indication in the second line the signs of weakness and woe that seemed to burden every face he saw. His creativity of maybe exaggerating what he truthfully had seen also marks the reader with the same weaknesses and woes that gage felt by the people being described in the poem.The next two meters become even more depressing and unfold into a deepening pessimistic view of London and its inhabitants. Blake still exaggerates his views on London, for exampleevery Man, every Infants, every theatrical roleThis overemphasis of these nouns also brings out the imagery of the scene about every person feeling what is said in the poem. However the most emphasis is on the lineThe mind forgd manacles I hear.This is a good technique exercised by Blake as the word manacles means a craft for shackling the hands or something that confines or restrains. In this part of the poem however, Blake indicates that he hears mind forgd manacles which in this poem signifies that he was in all probability being pinned down or handcuffed in his mind symbolising in a steering a form of depression because of the unhappiness which he saw and he himself felt from the cries of men, and the cry of fear of infants and the voices of bans.The third verse continues the form of dramatic melancholy with the wordsHow the Chimney-sweepers cry both balefulning Church traumatisesRefers to only one chimney sweep and not every chimney sweep, as was the case at the beginning of the poem. pietism is brought into the poem here by references to the Church. However, these churches are portrayed as quite an the opposite to what we would probably expect in the twenty-first century. In this poem, Blake conveys t hem to appal the cry of the Chimney sweep rather than show concern for the boy. Where it says inexorablening Church, Blake could be difficult to show that the churches were turning a trick eye to the suffering population of London as the colour black is usually associated with and symbolises death and hard- subject matteredness in our society.The remaining lines of the third verse which draws attention to soldiers could imply that Blake was trying to link together the suffering of people to the sevensome Year War which had affected Great Britain greatly during Blakes period. In this particular part of the verse, Blake indicates that maybe the number of people suffering extends to the outskirts and beyond London. The last lines of the verseAnd in hapless Soldiers toiletRuns in line of products down Palace walls.is a good use of imagery used by Blake. It is obvious that the blood, which runs down the Palace walls, is the blood of the dying or dead soldiers. The reason for this p articular image is that Blake is trying to suggest that the blood being on the walls of the Palace is another way of conveying that the soldiers of the war had been the Palaces responsibility and them dying had caused them to be guilty of their deaths and the blood horrifyingly reveals this.The last verse of the poem seems to portray a very enigmatic view to the reader. It brings the poem to a filter end. Words of destruction are used in this verse, for exampleBlasts and blights. This verse tells more of a story than the other verses. It seems to depict the story of a young prostitute a youthful Harlot who owns a peasant of whom she causes to cry and for this reason, as well as her plagues, which could indicate a sexually transmitted disease, she cannot marry and so Blake uses the last words Marriage hearse display that she has no chance in marriage because of her problems.The poem written by William Wordsworth portrays a completely different view to that of William Blake. The po em is considerably cheerful and, unlike the disturbing story Blake was articulating, Wordsworth was giving a definition or his account of London and the view with which he could write a poem with. As Wordsworth was a poet who was inspired to write poetry from his love of character it seemed only a natural thing to do to write an account on what he saw of London while on a coach to France.The main difference to Blakes poem on London was Wordsworths opening lineEARTH has not anything to show more fairin which he seems also to exaggerate what he sees as Blake had but in a sanguine manner. as Blake also had done, Wordsworth had used imagery about what he saw of London. He uses rich words to portray a more regal city than that of what Blake saw, for examplemajesty, glittering, bright, smokeless, beautifully, and mighty heart.The imagery that he used wasThis City now doth, like a garment. which indicates that like a dress on a cleaning lady fits well, the beauty of the City of London a lso fits the scenery which Wordsworth saw. He had equiprobable seen the City in the morning when everything had been quiet as the wordsNeer saw I, never felt, a calm so deep Many people across the world even in the time of Wordsworth would hardly ever refer to London as being calm.The description of nouns and some by adjectives such asShips, towers, domes, theatres, temples, smokeless air, and river glideth, create a clam and sweet mood.The poem is not so much created by the people who live in the City but only of what Wordsworth had seen which and so makes the poem unreliable if the reader wants to find out about what the people who live in his poems are like.He talks also to divinity about the splendours that he sees and how calm he seems to think London is. dependable God The very houses seem asleepAnd all that mighty heart is lying stillThis indicates that Wordsworth may believe that London is a place where there is opportunity. In some cases this can be agreed but in others it just shows how much a look can deceive.The poem which affected me most was the poem by Blake. The interesting parts of the difference of these poems were that they were written at different times, Blakes before Wordsworths, and that they both underline on different things. Wordsworths poem even though very descriptive and managing to capture the readers imagination was not as effective as Blakes because Blake showed more of an insight to London which many of us in our society would and will never see.The way in which he was able to tell the story of only a hardly a(prenominal) peoples lives yet it seemed it was happening to everybody was equally effective. Hi use of imagery and puns made the reader think more about what he was feeling and how he was seeing London more than Wordsworths poem. some other interesting perspective of these two poems was the fact that how much the view of a person living in London could differ so much from an outsider looking into the city.