Finding the Good Life in Symposium Essay -- Philosophy essays

conclusion the true Life in Symposium There argon umteen contrasting interpretations of what the equitable vivification truly is. Individualists desire that the earnest life is satisfy oneself, era utilitarians believe that the sincere life is acting for the good of the sculptural relief of society. Philosophers, too, maintain their own interpretation. Plato alludes to the philosophers good life when he uses the phrase my greatest joyfulness. The inbred subjectivity of the word my tells the demander that philosophical conversation may not necessarily be everyones greatest pleasure. After all, my greatest pleasure comes from philosophical conversation, even if Im all a get a lineer, whether or not I look it will be to my advantage. All other chew out, especially the talk of bass businessmen like you, bores me to tears, and Im sorry for you and your friends because you think your affairs are important when really theyre totally trivial (Symposium 173C-D). The ca sual observer may believe that these lines, spoken by Apollodorus, are trite, offering little more than than any(prenominal) humor to begin Symposium. However, a well-learned reader will read amongst the lines and quickly realize that, embedded within the words of the passage lies a plethora of ideas that are integral to the work as a whole. The two primary ideas which stem from the preceding passage are the philosophers face of the good life and the very contrastive jazzs that philosophers lead. There are many different interpretations of what the good life truly is. Individualists believe that the good life is good-natured oneself, while utilitarians believe that the good life is acting for the good of the succour of society. Philosophers, too, contain their own interpretation. Plato alludes to the philosophers good life ... ... not only to listen to the ideas of others, but to make a judgment about those ideas by and by they save been keyd. In offering the judgmen t of the philosphers good life cosmos the go around one, Plato enticed his readers to attend his academy, one goal of his admit. The ultimate idea of the passage, and and so the book as a whole, is to for one to keep an open disposition to hear the opinions of others, and for one to divulge ones own opinions for the betterment of society. After these opinions have been heard, vox populi through, and fully realized, individuals have the capacity to make decisions for the good of themselves and those almost them. When these intellectual, religious decisions are made correctly, human beings can begin to live the good life. Works CitedPlato. Symposium. Trans. Alexander Nehemas & Paul Woodruff. Indianapolis Hackett Publishing Company, 1989. purpose the Good Life in Symposium Essay -- Philosophy essaysFinding theGood Life in Symposium There are many different interpretations of what the good life truly is. Individualists believe that the good life is pleasing on eself, while utilitarians believe that the good life is acting for the good of the rest of society. Philosophers, too, have their own interpretation. Plato alludes to the philosophers good life when he uses the phrase my greatest pleasure. The inherent subjectivity of the word my tells the reader that philosophical conversation may not necessarily be everyones greatest pleasure. After all, my greatest pleasure comes from philosophical conversation, even if Im only a listener, whether or not I think it will be to my advantage. All other talk, especially the talk of rich businessmen like you, bores me to tears, and Im sorry for you and your friends because you think your affairs are important when really theyre totally trivial (Symposium 173C-D). The casual observer may believe that these lines, spoken by Apollodorus, are trite, offering little more than some humor to begin Symposium. However, a well-learned reader will read between the lines and quickly realize that, embedded within the words of the passage lies a plethora of ideas that are integral to the work as a whole. The two primary ideas which stem from the preceding passage are the philosophers view of the good life and the very different lives that philosophers lead. There are many different interpretations of what the good life truly is. Individualists believe that the good life is pleasing oneself, while utilitarians believe that the good life is acting for the good of the rest of society. Philosophers, too, have their own interpretation. Plato alludes to the philosophers good life ... ... not only to listen to the ideas of others, but to make a judgment about those ideas after they have been heard. In offering the judgment of the philosphers good life being the best one, Plato enticed his readers to attend his academy, one goal of his book. The ultimate idea of the passage, and indeed the book as a whole, is to for one to keep an open mind to hear the opinions of others, and for one to divulge one s own opinions for the betterment of society. After these opinions have been heard, thought through, and fully realized, individuals have the capacity to make decisions for the good of themselves and those around them. When these intellectual, spiritual decisions are made correctly, human beings can begin to live the good life. Works CitedPlato. Symposium. Trans. Alexander Nehemas & Paul Woodruff. Indianapolis Hackett Publishing Company, 1989.