.

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

Native American and The US government Essay -- essays papers

infixed the Statesn and The US govern massstThe Iroquois solid ground was a nation of vanadium tribes, which was comprised of Mohawks, Senecas, Oneidas, Cayugas, and Onondagas. These tribes were originally separated, but later brought together by two Indians named Hiawatha and Deganawidah. Hiawatha seemed to be the spokesman while Deganawidah took on the role as a philosopher. These two men formed a nation where some of the ideas are still entire today. One aspect that made them so strong was the way in which they governed themselves. Women in their society were basically in charge, except for the Sachems who were representatives appointed by the heads of the Ohwachiras. When this federal assembly met, the Sachems voted as tribes instead as individuals. This in some ways foundation be compared to present day government electoral votes.A nonher aspect I found that created a strong haleness was the brass of power, which was demonstrated in their seating arrangement. The Mohawks and Senecas sat on genius side, while the Oneidas and Cayugas on the other. The two tribes were separated with the Onondagas sitting between them. This arrangement was a lot like present days oddment of power in the three different branches of the Federal Government. The government of the Iroquois Nation has set themselves apart from almost all other Indians of North America and made it a powerful force in denouncing the Indians as be savages. Todays inherent Ameri open fire has adopted many of the ideas of the Iroquois Nation. Native American taradiddle is handed down amongst the tribes through spoken dustup and rituals. Native American righteousness is centered on the idea that every(prenominal) day items as well as the nature surrounding them can possess spirit. Euro-Christians views are more anonymous as to religion and more scientific concerning their history. Native Americans view of history contains many inconclusive facts when looked at from a Europ ean point of view. When you get their lack of a written language, there are many pillow slips where they do name specific places from which they originate. Unlike the Euro-Christians, these places the Native Americans declare of can be found today. In contrast, Euro-Christian religion/history speaks of the garden of Eden, but with no specific location as to where the garden can be found. Native American history is interwoven with... ...for what they needed to exist, not to turn a profit and destroy nature (the wilderness).Native Americans survey of gifts as symbolic gestures of friendship and peace at first. They would look at all trade as an exchange of gifts. They would deport feasts after trades with the French, for instance to bolster the moral and finalize a deal. Even when the stakes were proud and the Europeans knew that it was a gift and not a trade, the natives thought it to be a gift. When the Europeans traded gifts to the Natives for land, the Natives assume d they were trading a gift for the use of land, not astute that land can be owned. Land was a sacred affair to the Natives and I doubt they would have traded any of it, if they knew the implications of these gifts they were receiving (in trade).The Europeans on the other hand knew that the natives didnt know what some of these trades meant. A few Europeans tried to condone it to the natives, but to no avail. The Natives didnt understand to the Europeans delight. They used this against the Natives who couldnt have known the value of what they were giving up. The Europeans were at fault by discerning these trades to be absurd and unfair.

No comments:

Post a Comment