Pirates of Silicon Valley Essay

1. How would you describe some(prenominal) Jobs and gate mutation demonstrate?a. Internal An innovation work at must confuse a defined goal, mission, and mickle to keep the innovation competitive and made. A firm should contract with internal planning and move on to the execution of their innovation erst goals and objectives have been defined. Steve Jobs was a rebel who built illegal blue boxes and washed- kayoed his youthful energies pulling pranks that repeatedly got him suspended from racy school. He wasnt a technical genius (that was his partner Steve Wozniak) but he had an nonrational sense of design and usability, and an almost improvisational approach to billet decisions. Jobs was, in essence, a jazz musician who relied on his innate creativity, and turned his lack of noble training into a strength rather than a weakness. His vision, to create a computer for ordinary mints use, seemed wildly far-fetched to most people at the time. Furthermore, IBM laughed at th is idea and even questioned why an ordinary person would need a computer. Finally, despite being turned down by investors and laughed at for his ideas, apple was born in his garage, and the Macintosh was born. Jobs believed in closed-systems (or fully-integrated systems), heart and soul that one smart set designed the computer, the software package and all connected devices and peripherals. This legal opinion is what gives Apple products their unique look, and also why Apple products work so well together. Jobs had a masteryful internal innovation service because he had the technological expertness, a clear vision guiding him to success, and a supporting team that was prepared to work late nights and long days to define this vision become a reality. add-in provide internal innovation process began with the protagonist of his agonist Paul, writing code for computers. They eventually dropped out of Harvard to pursue their passion of programming and with the invention of BASIC a youthful vision was born. They got signed by MITS and convinced competitors, IBM, Xerox, and Apple that they needed his expertise to write code for their computers. Once supply had his foot in the gravelion at Apple, he had access to new code and ideas, which got him thinking he could do it discontinue than Jobs was doing at Apple. He was sufficient to infiltrate and conduce unscathed with Apples operational system.Furthermore bypirating his competitors operating systems, he gained enough knowledge and expertise to start his own participation, Microsoft. It appears furnish was more unorganized than Jobs in the sense that he lacked proper preparation. He had an incomplete operating system until he stole code from early(a) systems like Xerox and Apple. Consequently, Bill Gates internal innovation process was largely due to replicating some other companies code. Although this was a dishonest plan, he succeeded by tricking his competitors and ultimately joined Apples team in the end, keeping his project mystic on the side. b. External External innovation involves enhancing or adding to something that already exists. In Jobs case, he is creating the premier(prenominal) ain computer as opposed to creating the first computer. In Gates case, he is enhancing the computer with programming and integrating a language for computers that already exist. Steve Jobs main external pressures in his innovation process were his competitors. While he did not notice it at the time, his biggest competitor, Bill Gates, was pirating his software behind his back. Steve Wozniak also quit at one point because of Jobs inadequate leadership and self-obsession. Jobs demanded too much of his workers and in return his company despised working for him. Ultimately, Jobs succeeded in his external innovation process but at the cost of losing friends, and good employees.Unlike Steve Jobs, Bill Gates was more successful through his external innovation process. The Microsoft model was a product of imitating his competitors. Bill Gates convinced his competitors that they needed his talents and in return he gained priceless knowledge. He did not collapse infra pressure and stayed humble end-to-end his success to ultimately take advantage of his competitors and land on top.2. For some(prenominal) internal and external acquisition of technology, how was implementation handled? What areas were Jobs and Gates Hardware and software package particularly lacking?Implementation was handled moderately well by both Jobs and Gates. Although they did not have much of a written plan they lock seemed to have a plan of what they wanted to do with the information they knew, and in what direction, more or less, they wanted to go in. Jobs had a pretty fairlywell thought out plan in the sense that he went around e rattlingwhere for loans and eventually changed his compute in order to better his chances. Luck also struck Jobs when the investor came to his garage and offered him a $250,000 investment to help him with the Apple Computers. Jobs implemented his first innovation, Lisa through Apple. He had reputable concrete assets including capital, technology, office space, and many technicians. While the technicians were vital assets to Jobs, they were being over worked and were under appreciated. Throughout the movie it is clear that there was a negative company culture emerging, which inversely impacted his intangible assets. Jobs narcissistic personality got him punched in the face at one point. This displays how Apple workers disliked Jobs as a leader and were constantly on edge from lack of sleep and high expectations. The film portrayed Bill Gates as a weapons-grade leader than Jobs because he remained loyal to his team throughout the film.Beginning in his garage and eventually moving towards a partnership with Apple, Gates was able to continuously motivate his team and keep morale high. He cerebrate on engaging his team and explained to competitors how they needed his expertise to create a programming language. Gates gained all the resources he needed through gaining access to his competitors software and ended with great a implementation process for Microsoft. In both of their implementation processes, they lacked a bit of control and awareness. Gates had somewhat better control and awareness in the sense that he motto the flaws in Jobs reign. Jobs (once Apple computers became bigger than just two guys in a garage) was not fully aware of what he was becoming and what he was doing to his company internally. He had two different sides in his company competing against each other and he also treated his employees like machines rather than people. Gates (along with Jobs friend Wise) was aware of this problem and helped Jobs overcome it.3. How well did Jobs and Gates understand the surroundings in which they were trying to compete? What specific areas challenged their chance of success in the environment?In understan ding the environment that Gates and Jobs were competing in, they understood it very well. Both Steve Jobs and Bill Gates had extensiveknowledge about construct and coding computers. Jobs had a vision of giving the public access to computers. He was very knowledgeable in starting Apple and turning his vision into reality. Similarly, Gates was skilled in computer programming and was able to cast Microsoft with the help of his competitors. Steve Jobs main challenge was dealing with employees and becoming a adjust leader. He was forced to grow up very quickly and without the experience, his image as a leader suffered. In one scene of the movie, Jobs walks into an call into question barefoot and tells the candidate that he does not belong at Apple and then makes inappropriate personal attacks. This lack of professionalism shows that Jobs did not have managerial skills or leadership experience. On the other hand, it is clear Gates had business experience or had at least studied busine ss topics. Gates knew how much he could get away with. His sneakiness got him the information he needed but at the expense of jeopardizing his integrity. Gates understood that he needed to convince people (IBM) that they not only did not have what he was offering and creating, but that they needed what he was offering. The areas that challenged their chance of success in the environment were consumers and IBM. IBM said no one would use personal computers because average everyday people had no use for one. It was key that Gates knew how to sell his ideas and products, even if they hadnt even been produced or built yet. Finally, date both had extensive computer technology knowledge, Jobs lacked personal business skills and Gates lacked a defined plan of action. They both knew they were on to something bigger than the both of them and this is not always an easy idea to cope with.